Albert Einstein and Kurt Gödel were both mathematical geniuses and
the best of friends. Both men believed in God, although Gödel's faith
was definitely more conventional than Einstein's and he was more outspoken about
it. In his blog, Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem, KataChriston
explains how it demonstrates that it is impossible for us to develop
any type of a unified theory of knowledge. What that means is simply
that it is impossible for mathematics to prove itself. Of course science
is based on mathematics and this proposes a problem for those who base
their entire worldview on science: Science cannot validate itself.
What
is interesting to me is how science emerged largely within a Christian
context. Sociologist, Rodney Stark and historian/philosopher, Peter Harrison
have written extensively on the relationship between science and
Christianity. Would it have been possible for science to develop within a
purely non-theistic society? Some may balk at the very question, but
it's rather easy for an atheist living in the 21st century, living on
borrowed capital to just assume that the scientific method is an obvious
forgone conclusion. I've finally gotten around to reading Total Truth
by Nancy Pearcey, in which she points out that it is really only the
Judeo-Christian worldview that allows science to make any sense. Alvin
Plantinga, perhaps the most important philosopher in modern times,
demonstrated through his Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism,
how natural evolution circumvents us from being able to think we can
know anything; and this is to say nothing in regard to the hard core
natural/materialists who openly admit that the human conscience is but a
delusion.
Perhaps C.S. Lewis explained it best when
he said: "I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen:
not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else."
No comments:
Post a Comment